EVALUATION CRITERIA DEFINITIONS

Planning--Ability to develop comprehensive project work plan and adjust plan to changes in project needs

Staffing--Adequacy and qualifications of project staff to meet project management and technical needs; staffing availability, continuity, and performance; ability to provide the necessary resources when required to support expanded workload

Cost Reasonableness--Adherence to established budget; appropriate and efficient use of resources; cost-effectiveness; and value of products and services

Application of Requirements and Guidance--Knowledge of technical work scope, other requirements, and guidance; compliance with requirements; and application of technical guidance

Environment, Health and Safety--Understanding of the environmental, health and safety related issues and method by which they were assessed and managed

Innovation--Ability to develop new strategies or approaches to project implementation, original solutions to technical challenges, alternative analytical techniques, successful cost and schedule savings, and management efficiencies

Deliverable Quality--Completeness, clarity, technical accuracy, format, style, and grammatical quality of written deliverables, including text, figures, and graphics

Responsiveness--Responsiveness to client direction and instructions, work scope changes, and special requests; ability to identify and resolve problems

Teamwork/Cooperation--Cooperation and coordination with clients, other contractors, subcontractors, reviewers, and others; effective, proactive management; flexibility; and willingness to do whatever it takes to successfully complete a project

Communication--Clarity and effectiveness of written and verbal communication with the client, other contractors, subcontractors, and others on project technical scope, schedule, cost, routine matters, and issues; ability to effectively resolve potential conflicts

Timeliness--Timely project startup; adherence to project schedule; identification of potential delays; development and execution of measures to avert delay; and on-time submittal of deliverables

Overall Quality of Service--Level of satisfaction with Eberline Services’ overall performance
EVALUATION RATINGS DEFINITIONS

Excellent

Exceptional performance, achieving all contract requirements

Good

Effective performance with minor issues that did not impact achievement of all contract requirements

Fair

Performance supported achievement of most contract requirements

Poor

Weakness compromised achievement of contract requirements

Unsatisfactory

Contract requirements were not achieved because of failure to meet performance criterion